China’s factory activity decline slows as COVID curbs ease
China’s industrial activity shrank at a slower pace in May as lockdowns eased in major cities, even as ongoing COVID-19 restrictions cast a cloud over the outlook for the world’s second-largest economy.
The official manufacturing purchasing managers’ index (PMI) rose to 49.6 in May, up from 47.4 in April, the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) said on Tuesday.
A reading below 50 on the index, which is based on a monthly survey of enterprises across China, indicates a contraction in activity.
China’s slowing factory activity comes amid signs of negative spillover for production in other leading Asian economies, including Japan and South Korea, both of which have reported sharp declines in industrial output.
While the PMI hit a three-month high, it remained below the 50-point mark that separates contraction from growth for the third straight month.
“It shows the impact of COVID-19 outbreaks in May have not fully ended, leaving the economic outlook grim since the second quarter in 2020,” said Pang Ming, chief economist at Huaxing Securities.
Declines in China’s midstream and downstream production were larger than they were upstream, and small firms were hit harder than large firms, Pang said.
The subindex for production rose to 49.7 in May from 44.4 in April while the new orders subindex rose to 48.2 from 42.6.
“This showed manufacturing production and demand have recovered to varying degrees, but the recovery momentum needs to be strengthened,” said Zhao Qinghe, senior statistician at the NBS, in a statement accompanying the data release.
Though restrictions in the crucial manufacturing hubs of Shanghai and the northeast eased in May, analysts said the output resumption was slow, restrained by sluggish domestic consumption and softening global demand.
Sheana Yue, an economist at Capital Economics, said although activity has started to rebound as COVID-19 curbs ease, the recovery is likely to remain tepid.
“Indeed, there continues to be signs of supply chain disruptions in the survey breakdown,” Yue said. “Delivery times lengthened further while firms continued to draw down their inventories of raw materials, although at a less rapid pace than in April.”
That would further hamper exports, which lost momentum this year, casting a shadow over the economic rebound.
Many analysts expect the economy to shrink in the April-June quarter from a year earlier, compared with the first quarter’s 4.8 percent growth.
China’s economy was ravaged by strict restrictions in April as the country grappled with the worst COVID-19 outbreak since 2020, with economic difficulties in some aspects now worse than two years ago.
Profits at China’s industrial firms fell at their fastest pace in two years last month as high raw material prices and supply chain chaos eroded margins.
In line with the weakness in the factory sector, services remained soft. The official non-manufacturing PMI in May rose to 47.8 from 41.9 in April.
As consumers were confined to homes, retail sales in April shrank 11.1 percent from a year earlier, the biggest contraction since March 2020, with catering services and auto sales particularly hit.
Activity in contact-intensive sectors was still in contraction, pointing to considerable pressure on the services industry, the PMIs showed.
The employment subindex in the services sector slipped to 45.3, down 0.5 of a point from April, showing sustained job market pressure. That is likely to raise challenges for the government in a politically sensitive year, which has prioritised job stabilisation.
China’s official composite PMI, which includes both manufacturing and services activity, stood at 48.4, up from 42.7.
With greater urgency to support the pandemic-hit economy, Premier Li Keqiang last week reiterated frontloading of policy support and said China would seek positive year-on-year economic growth in the second quarter.
Beijing has promised to broaden tax rebates, postpone social security payments and loan repayments and roll out new investment projects to support the economy, even as authorities have given no indication of an end to the ultra-strict zero-COVID policy.