Complex multi-fault rupture and triggering during the 2023 earthquake doublet in southeastern Türkiye – Nature Communications
McKenzie, D. Active tectonics of the Alpine-Himalayan belt: the Aegean Sea and surrounding regions. Geophys. J. Int. 55, 217–254 (1978).
Google Scholar
Sengör, A. M. C., Gorur, N. & Saroglu, F. Strike-slip faulting and related basin formation in zones of tectonic escape: Turkey as a case study. In: Biddle, K., & Christie-Blick, N. (Eds)., Strike-slip Faulting and Basin Formation. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication 37, Tulsa, OK (1985).
Dewey, J. F., Hempton, M. R., Kidd, W. S., Saroglu, F. & Sengör, A M. C. Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of eastern Anatolia-a young collision zone. In Coward, M.P., & Ries, A. C. (Eds.). Collision Tectonics, 19. Special Publication Geological Society of London, 3–36 (1986).
Jackson, J. A. & McKenzie, D. P. The relationship between plate motions and seismic moment tensors, and the rates of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East. Geophys. J. Int. 93, 45–73 (1988).
Google Scholar
Taymaz, T., Eyidog̃an, H. & Jackson, J. Source parameters of large earthquakes in the East Anatolian fault zone (Turkey). Geophys. J. Int. 106, 537–550 (1991).
Google Scholar
Ambraseys, N. N. & Jackson, J. A. Faulting associated with historical and recent earthquakes in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Geophys. J. Int. 133, 390–406 (1998).
Google Scholar
Reilinger, R. et al. GPS constraints on continental deformation in the Africa‐Arabia‐Eurasia continental collision zone and implications for the dynamics of plate interactions. J. Geophy. Res. Solid Earth, 111, B05411 (2006).
Cambaz, M. D. & Mutlu, A. K. Regional moment tensor inversion for earthquakes in Turkey and its surroundings: 2008-2015. Seismol. Res. Lett. 87, 1082–1990. (2016).
Google Scholar
Taymaz, T. et al. Source mechanism and rupture process of the 24 January 2020 MW 6.7 Doganyol-Sivrice earthquake obtained from seismological waveform analysis and space geodetic observations on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (Turkey). Tectonophysics 804, 228745 (2021).
Google Scholar
İnceöz, M., Baykara, O., Aksoy, E. & Doğru, M. Measurements of soil gas radon in active fault systems: a case study along the North and East Anatolian fault systems in Turkey. Radiat. Meas. 41, 349–353 (2006).
Google Scholar
Aksoy, E., Inceöz, M. & Kocyigit, A. Lake hazar basin: a negative flower structure on the East Anatolian Fault System (EAFS), SE Turkey. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 16, 319–338 (2007).
Colak, S., Aksoy, E., Koçyiğit, A. & İnceöz, M. The Palu-Uluova strike-slip basin in the east Anatolian fault system, Turkey: its transition from the Palaeotectonic to Neotectonic stage. Turk. J. Earth Sci. 21, 547–570 (2012).
Güvercin, S. E., Karabulut, H., Konca, A. Ö., Doğan, U. & Ergintav, S. Active seismotectonics of the East Anatolian Fault. Geophys. J. Int. 230, 50–69 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chorowicz, J., Luxey, P., Lyberis, N., Caravlho, J. & Parrot, J.-F. The Maras Triple Junction (southern Turkey) based on digital elevation model and satellite imagery interpretation. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 20,225–20,242 (1994).
Google Scholar
Duman, T. Y. & Emre, Ö. The East Anatolian Fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics. Geol. Soc., Lond., Spec. Publ. 372, 495–529 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lyberis, N., Yurur, T., Chorowicz, J., Kasapoglu, E. & Gundogdu, N. The East Anatolian Fault: an oblique collisional belt. Tectonophysics 204, 1–15 (1992).
Google Scholar
Cetin, H., Güneyli, H. & Mayer, L. Paleoseismology of the Palu–Lake Hazar segment of the East Anatolian fault zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 374, 163–197 (2003).
Google Scholar
Ambraseys, N. N. Temporary seismic quiescence: SE Turkey. Geophysical. Journal 96, 311–331 (1989).
Nalbant, S. S., McCloskey, J., Steacy, S. & Barka, A. A. Stress accumulation and increased seismic risk in eastern Turkey. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 195, 291–298 (2002).
Google Scholar
Bletery, Q., Cavalié, O., Nocquet, J.-M. & Ragon, T. Distribution of interseismic coupling along the North and East Anatolian Faults inferred from InSAR and GPS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087775 (2020).
Google Scholar
Weiss, J. R. et al. High-resolution surface velocities and strain for Anatolia from Sentinel-1 InSAR and GNSS data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087376 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ozener, H. et al. Kinematics of the eastern part of the North Anatolian Fault Zone. J. Geodyn. 49, 141–150 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Y. et al. Kinematic study at the junction of the East Anatolian Fault and the Dead Sea fault from GPS measurements. J. Geodyn. 67, 30–39 (2013).
Google Scholar
Aktug, B. et al. Slip rates and seismic potential on the East Anatolian fault system using an improved GPS velocity field. J. Geodyn. 94-95, 1–12 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cheloni, D. & Akinci, A. Source modeling and strong ground motion simulations for the 24 January 2020, MW 6.8 Elazig earthquake, Turkey. Geophys. J. Int. 223, 1054–1068 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, K., Zhang, Liang, C., Xue, C. & Liu, P. Kinematics and dynamics of the 24 January 2020 MW 6.7 Elazig, Turkey, earthquake. Earth Space Sci. 7, e2020EA001452 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lin, X. et al. Coseismic slip distribution of the 24 January 2020 MW 6.7 Doganyol earthquake and in relation to the foreshock and aftershock activities. Seismol. Res. Lett. 92, 127–139 (2021).
Google Scholar
Melgar, D. et al. Rupture kinematics of 2020 January 24 MW 6.7 Doganyol-Sivrice, Turkey earthquake on the East Anatolian Fault Zone imaged by space geodesy. Geophys. J. Int. 223, 862–874 (2020).
Google Scholar
Xu, J., Liu, C. & Xiong, X. Source process of the 24 January 2020 MW 6.7 East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, earthquake. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91, 3120–3128 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alkan, H., Büyüksarac, A., Bektas, Ö. & Isik, E. Coulomb stress change before and after 24.01.2020 Sivrice (Elazig) Earthquake (MW = 6.8) on the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Arab. J. Geosci. 14, 2648 (2021).
Google Scholar
Irmak, T. S., Toker, M., Yavuz, E., Sentürk, E. & Güvenaltin New insight into the 24 January 2020, MW 6.8 Elazig earthquake (Turkey): An evidence for rupture-parallel pull-apart basin activation along the East Anatolian Fault Zone constrained by geodetic and seismological data. Ann. Geophys. 64, SE439–SE439 (2021).
Google Scholar
Arpat, E. & Saroglu, F. The East Anatolian Fault System; thoughts on its development. Bull. Miner. Res. Explor. Inst. Turk. 78, 33–39 (1972).
Reitman, G. N. et al. Preliminary fault rupture mapping of the 2023 M7. 8 and M7. 5 Türkiye Earthquakes. USGS: Reston, VA, USA (2023).
Petersen, G. M. et al. The 2023 Southeast Türkiye seismic sequence: Rupture of a complex fault network. Seism. Rec. 3, 134–143 (2023).
Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. E. et al. Rapid characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, earthquake sequence. Seismic Rec. 3, 156–167 (2023).
Google Scholar
Barbot, S. et al. Slip distribution of the February 6, 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey earthquake sequence in the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Seismica, 2 (2023).
Mai, P. M. et al. The destructive earthquake doublet of 6 February 2023 in South‐Central Türkiye and Northwestern Syria: initial observations and analyses. Seism. Rec. 3, 105–115 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. Source model of the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequence imaged by Sentinel-1 and GPS measurements: Implications for heterogeneous fault behavior along the East Anatolian Fault Zone. Remote Sens. 15, 2618 (2023).
Google Scholar
An, Q. et al. Three-dimensional deformation of the 2023 Turkey Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.7 earthquake sequence obtained by fusing optical and SAR Images. Remote Sens. 15, 2656 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, R., Schurr, B., Milkereit, C., Shao, Z. & Jin, M. An improved automatic scheme for empirical baseline correction of digital strong-motion records. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101, 2029–2044 (2011).
Google Scholar
Fliss, S., Bhat, H. S., Dmowska, R. & Rice, J. R. Fault branching and rupture directivity. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B06312 (2005).
Melgar, D. et al. Sub-and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye. Seismica, 2 (2023).
Bouchon, M. & Karabulut, H. The aftershock signature of supershear earthquakes. Science 320, 1323–1325 (2008).
Google Scholar
Xu, L. et al. Understanding the rupture kinematics and slip model of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo earthquake: a bilateral event on bifurcating faults. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 128, e2022JB025936 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stein, R. S. The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature 402, 605–609 (1999).
Google Scholar
Hubert-Ferrari, A. et al. A 3800 yr paleoseismic record (Lake Hazar sediments, eastern Turkey): Implications for the East Anatolian Fault seismic cycle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 538, 116152 (2020).
Google Scholar
Okuwaki, R., Yagi, Y., Taymaz, T. & Hicks, S. P. Multi-scale rupture growth with alternating directions in a complex fault network during the 2023 south-eastern Türkiye and Syria earthquake doublet. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL103480 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jia, Z. et al. The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey, Mw 7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet. Science (2023).
Convers, J. A. & Newman, A. V. Global evaluation of large earthquake energy from 1997 through mid-2010. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B08304 (2011).
Zhang, X., Feng, W., Du, H., Samsonov, S. & Yi, L. Supershear rupture during the 2021 MW 7.4 Maduo, China, earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL097984 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bouchon, M. et al. How fast is rupture during an earthquake? New insights from the 1999 Turkey earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 2723–2726 (2001).
Google Scholar
Konca, A. O., Leprince, S., Avouac, J. P. & Helmberger, D. V. Rupture process of the 1999 MW 7.1 Duzce Earthquake from joint analysis of SPOT, GPS, InSAR, strong-motion, and teleseismic data: a supershear rupture with variable rupture velocity. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 267–288 (2010).
Google Scholar
Oglesby, D. D., Mai, P. M., Atakan, K. & Pucci, S. Dynamic models of earthquakes on the North Anatolian fault zone under the Sea of Marmara: effect of hypocenter location. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L18302 (2008).
Geng, J. et al. PRIDE PPP-AR: an open-source software for GPS PPP ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut. 23, 1–10. (2019).
Google Scholar
Ji, C., Wald, D. J. & Helmberger, D. V. Source description of the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, Part I: Wavelet domain inversion theory and resolution analysis. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 1192–1207 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ji, C., Helmberger, D. V., Wald, D. J. & Ma, K. F. Slip history and dynamic implications of the 1999 Chi‐Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 108, 2412 (2003).
Google Scholar
Ozer, C., Ozyazicioglu, M., Gok, E. & Polat, O. Imaging the crustal structure throughout the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, by local earthquake tomography. Pure Appl. Geophy. 176, 2235–2261 (2019).
Google Scholar
Scholz, C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting 3rd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Wang, R., Lorenzo-Martín, F. & Roth, F. PSGRN/PSCMP-a new code for calculating co-and post-seismic deformation, geoid, and gravity changes based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory. Comput. Geosci. 32, 527–541 (2006).
Google Scholar
