Performance analytics: Türkiye 3-1 Georgia

In a match that defied the expected metrics, Türkiye secured a resounding 3-1 victory over Georgia despite being outplayed in many statistical categories. This game was a vivid illustration of football’s unpredictability and the importance of seizing key moments.

Georgia dominated possession with 56%, completed more passes (510 to Türkiye’s 377), and had a higher accuracy rate (89.0% to Türkiye’s 86.0%). They created more big chances (6 to 5) and took more total shots (22 to 14), yet Türkiye’s efficiency and resilience turned the tide in their favor. The Expected Goals (xG) metric also favored Georgia, who generated 2.7 xG compared to Türkiye’s 1.59, highlighting their profligacy in front of goal.

Türkiye’s field tilt of 63.71% compared to Georgia’s 36.29% suggests a focus on high-pressure moments and strategic positioning. While Georgia controlled the ball, Türkiye’s pressing game, evidenced by a Passes per Defensive Action (PPDA) of 12.63 compared to Georgia’s 14.41, disrupted their rhythm effectively.

Hakan Çalhanoglu was instrumental for Türkiye, receiving the most passes (87) and completing 88 out of 97, directing play from midfield with precision. Abdülkerim Bardakci’s 32 progressive passes demonstrated Türkiye’s intent to move forward quickly and decisively, contrasting with Georgia’s more methodical buildup.

Khvicha Kvaratskhelia shone for Georgia, completing 10 progressive carries and posting the highest xT of 0.57, constantly probing Türkiye’s defense. His efforts, however, were not enough to overcome Türkiye’s solid defensive structure, which included 26 clearances and 7 blocks, compared to Georgia’s 19 and 4, respectively.

Defensively, Türkiye showed grit, winning 16 tackles (70.0%) compared to Georgia’s 14 (78.0%), and making more interceptions (8 to 6). This defensive solidity was complemented by keeper saves, with Türkiye’s goalkeeper making 5 saves to Georgia’s 3, ensuring their lead was protected.

In aerial duels, Georgia had the upper hand, winning 19 to Türkiye’s 12 (61.0% to 39.0%). However, Türkiye dominated ground duels, winning 39 to Georgia’s 27 (59.0% to 41.0%), showcasing their ability to win crucial battles on the pitch. This physical edge was further highlighted by Türkiye’s superior successful dribbles (6 to 2), demonstrating their attacking intent and ability to bypass Georgian defenders.

Despite Georgia’s statistical superiority in many areas, Türkiye’s ability to capitalize on their opportunities and maintain defensive solidity made the difference. Their 3-1 victory was built on a foundation of resilience and tactical acumen, turning the game’s narrative in their favor through crucial moments of efficiency.

In summary, Türkiye’s victory over Georgia was a testament to the importance of seizing moments and maintaining defensive discipline. The statistics highlight Georgia’s dominance in possession and opportunities, but Türkiye’s effectiveness in key phases of the game secured them a memorable win.